Product · Due Diligence Intelligence

The data room goes in. A memo the IC can defend comes out.

CIM, VDR, audited financials, quarterly pack — read, reconciled against each other, and returned as a Quick Summary Report, an IIRC memo, or a cited answer. Every number carries its page.

The model proposes. The platform verifies. The analyst signs.

vitalfusion · deal-room · project-meridian
Analyst
Draft the QSR for Project Meridian from the CIM and the FY23–FY25 financials.
VitalFusion
QSR drafted — two pages. Revenue CAGR 18.4%, top-three customer concentration 41%. The adjusted EBITDA bridge reconciles except a $2.1M add-back with no supporting schedule in the room. Three items flagged for your confirmation.
CIM_Meridian.pdf · p.14FY25_Audited.pdf · Note 4VDR/03_Financials/EBITDA_bridge.xlsx
Analyst
What supports the add-back?
VitalFusion
Nothing in the room — it appears once, in the CIM, unsourced. Two prior deals used the same adviser; both add-backs were reversed at IC. Added to the seller information request.

Illustrative interface · every figure traces to a document, page or cell

Three outputs

One evidence layer. Three ways out.

One for speed, one for the committee, one for everything the templates didn't anticipate. A figure confirmed in one is the same figure in the others.

01 · Screen

QSR — Quick Summary Report

CIM in, screening view out — in minutes.

AnswersIs this worth a team's week?
InputCIM or IM; optionally the VDR financials
OutputTwo pages, house format

Sections

  1. Snapshot — target, sector, size, process, adviser
  2. The business in three sentences
  3. Financial profile & EBITDA bridge
  4. Customer & revenue concentration
  5. Market claims — sourced, asserted or unsupported
  6. Capital structure & the ask
  7. Red flags & gaps
  8. Verdict — pursue, watch, pass

Controls. Every figure cites a page or cell. Management assertions look different from audited facts.

02 · Decide

IIRC memo

The committee paper, drafted from evidence rather than retyped from it.

AnswersWhat the Internal Investment Committee votes on
InputFull room — CIM, VDR, QoE, legal DD, model, prior QSR
OutputSame-day first draft, then analyst edits

Sections

  1. Recommendation & terms
  2. Transaction overview
  3. Thesis — with the disconfirming evidence
  4. Business & market
  5. Financials & quality of earnings
  6. Management & governance
  7. Risks & mitigants, ranked
  8. Diligence status log
  9. Valuation & returns
  10. ESG, legal, tax
  11. CPs & 100-day plan
  12. Appendices — sources, citations, change log

Controls. A conflict register for figures that disagree across sources, a diff against last week's draft, and an explicit tag on anything unconfirmed.

03 · Ask

Chat — the room, interrogated

For every question a template didn't anticipate.

AnswersAnything in the corpus, in plain English
ScopeOne document, a workstream, a deal, or past deals — always shown
OutputAnswer, figures, citations, confidence

Modes

  • Ask — Q&A across the deal
  • Compare — against a prior deal or comparators
  • Challenge — argue against the thesis from the room
  • Draft — a memo section or seller request list
  • Watch — standing questions, re-run as documents land

Controls. "Not in the room" is a first-class answer. Scope is disclosed, and the transcript joins the deal's audit record.

How it works

Three roles. Only one signs.

Model — proposes

Facts, figures and risks pulled from the room, each bound to the sentence, cell or clause that produced it.

Platform — verifies

The same fact sought across CIM, accounts, model and contract. Conflicts are surfaced, never averaged away.

Analyst — signs

Confirm, override, annotate. Nothing reaches the committee until a named person clears the flags.

01

Ingest

VDR sync, scans, models and board packs — deduplicated, versioned, OCR'd.

02

Extract

Multimodal table OCR for covenant tables, ageing schedules, cap tables, EBITDA bridges.

03

Reconcile

One canonical figure per metric, with a variance record and an open-conflict list.

04

Analyse

Materiality, concentration, covenant and red-flag checks; comparison against your prior deals.

05

Produce

QSR, IIRC memo, chat answer, or export to your template — fully attributed.

Where it pays off

From first teaser to next re-underwrite.

01

Screening at volume

A QSR on every CIM that lands; passes documented, not forgotten.

02

Full diligence

The finding log stays live as workstreams close; the memo assembles from confirmed evidence.

03

The committee meeting

"Where does that number come from?" — answered in the room, page on screen.

04

Post-close

The same evidence layer carries into quarterly reporting and covenant tracking.

Delivery

Two harnesses. One evidence contract.

The product is the evidence layer — citations, reconciliation, analyst sign-off. It runs on whichever harness your firm already trusts.

Harness 01

GHC harness in Copilot

Inside the Microsoft estate your analysts already work in — the deal room, the memo and the chat where the documents already live.

Harness 02

LangGraph second brain

Open orchestration on your cloud, built as a custom application: every agent step an inspectable node, and the deal corpus kept as persistent memory — every prior deal, adviser and adjustment queryable in the next one.

Due Diligence Intelligence

Bring a data room we shouldn't be able to summarise.

One closed deal's corpus. We return the QSR, a draft IIRC memo and a live chat over it — inside your tenancy, cloud or air-gapped. Nothing leaves.